Ich möchte dem Hegelschen Geist der Thesen etwas stärker durch Stirner Inspiriertes entgegen halten und den Blick vom "großen Bild der Zukunft" auf die Dynamik des Heute richten, in dem ja angeblich die Keime der Zukunft schon wirken - oder aber der Traum von Zukunft taugt nicht, wie letztlich der vom "Sozialismus im 20. Jahrhundert"
Fortschritt = Veränderung ds Status quo
Jeder engere Fortschrittsbegriff braucht einen Richter
Die Natur richtet nicht, sondern öffnet und schließt Nischen
Die "Ökonomie des Fortschritts" - ein paar Gleichungen
Die Grundgleichung der Ökonomie: p=c+v+m
Die Grundgleichung der Ökonomie des Fortschritts: m=p-c-v
Der "fungierende Kapitalist": m=r+u
Rohgewinn und Reingewinn: r=t+z+a+r'
Die produktive Infrastruktur der Gesellschaft als dissipative Struktur - die Benardzellen des Fortschritts
Innovation und Ubiquität - Der tendenzielle Fall der Profitrate
Von Innovation zu Ubiquität - Der Lebenszyklus technologischer Neuerungen
Commodification (Franz Naetar) - wie Waren zu "wirklichen Waren" werden
Digital technology transforms the bourgeois economy. The dominant goods in the system of production--the articles of cultural consumption that are both commodities sold and instructions to the worker on what and how to buy--along with all other forms of culture and knowledge now have zero marginal cost. Anyone and everyone may have the benefit of all works of culture: music, art, literature, technical information, science, and every other form of knowledge. Barriers of social inequality and geographic isolation dissolve. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of people. And as in material, so also in intellectual production. The intellectual creations of individual people become common property. Modern bourgeois society with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer's apprentice, who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells.
Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted to it, and by the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. But ``free competition'' was never more than an aspiration of bourgeois society, which constantly experienced the capitalists' intrinsic preference for monopoly. Bourgeois property exemplified the concept of monopoly, denying at the level of practical arrangements the dogma of freedom bourgeois law inconsistently proclaimed. As, in the new digital society, creators establish genuinely free forms of economic activity, the dogma of bourgeois property comes into active conflict with the dogma of bourgeois freedom. Protecting the ownership of ideas requires the suppression of free technology, which means the suppression of free speech. The power of the State is employed to prohibit free creation. Scientists, artists, engineers and students are prevented from creating or sharing knowledge, on the ground that their ideas imperil the owners' property in the system of cultural production and distribution. It is in the courts of the owners that the creators find their class identity most clearly, and it is there, accordingly, that the conflict begins.